Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

Metascore for Games: Understanding the Popular Metric


The ever-expanding diversity and sheer number of video games can be overwhelming for both casual players and seasoned enthusiasts. With so many options available, how do gamers discern the truly exceptional experiences from the mediocre ones? Enter Metascore – a crucial and widely utilized metric that helps gamers and critics alike assess a game’s quality and overall appeal. In this guide, we will delve into what Meta score is and how it works, shedding light on its significance in the gaming industry.

What is Metascore?

It is a numerical value, typically ranging from 0 to 100, assigned to video games based on aggregated reviews from various reputable critics and publications. It acts as a comprehensive measure of a game’s critical reception and quality. Developed by the renowned website Metacritic in 1999, the Metascore system aims to provide an impartial and standardized evaluation that can assist both consumers and developers in understanding the reception of a game in the market.

How Does Metascore Work?

Meta score relies on a meticulous process of gathering and synthesizing reviews from credible sources. The system primarily revolves around the following steps:

  • Review Collection: Metacritic employs a team of dedicated professionals to scour the web for reviews from a wide array of sources, including established gaming websites, print publications, and video game-focused blogs. These sources encompass both mainstream and niche platforms to offer a comprehensive view of a game’s reception.
  • Assigning Scores: Each critic’s review is translated into a numerical score. Reviewers often rate games on a scale of 0 to 10 or 0 to 100 or even use letter grades. Metacritic converts all scores into a standardized 0 to 100 scale to maintain consistency.
  • Weighting Reviews: this score implements a weighted averaging system, giving more significance to certain critics and publications over others. Influential and reputable sources have a more substantial impact on the final score. This approach helps prevent any undue influence from less authoritative or biased reviews.
  • Calculation: Once all the reviews are collected, scores are weighted, and the Meta score is calculated by taking the weighted average of all the individual critic scores. The result is a single, concise number that represents the critical consensus on the game’s quality.
  • User Scores: Metacritic also features user scores, which are based on ratings provided by the gaming community. However, user scores tend to be more susceptible to manipulation and extreme opinions, which is why the Metascore remains the primary indicator of a game’s overall critical reception.

The Significance of Meta scores

Metascore plays a vital role in the gaming industry, benefiting multiple stakeholders:

  • Gamers: For gamers, this score serves as a valuable tool in making informed decisions about which games to purchase. It provides a quick snapshot of a game’s quality and allows players to gauge whether it aligns with their preferences before investing time and money.
  • Game Developers and Publishers: For developers and publishers, Meta scores act as a barometer for their game’s success and impact. A higher score can boost a game’s commercial performance and reputation, while a lower score may indicate areas that need improvement.
  • Critics and Publications: this score gives gaming critics and publications a platform to showcase their assessments and influence the wider gaming community. It encourages high-quality, thoughtful reviews and promotes transparency and accountability in game journalism.
  • Industry Insights: Meta scores data provide valuable insights into trends within the gaming industry. It allows analysts and researchers to identify patterns in critical reception over time, across genres, and among different platforms.

Limitations and Criticisms of Meta score

While Meta score is a powerful tool, it does have its limitations and has faced some criticisms over the years:

  • Subjectivity and Diversity: this score does not account for individual preferences or diverse player experiences. It represents an amalgamation of critics’ opinions, which may not always align with the tastes of every gamer.
  • Weighting System Critique: The method of weighting reviews has been subject to criticism, with concerns about the potential for bias or the exclusion of certain voices. The subjective nature of assigning weights to publications can raise questions about the objectivity of the system.
  • Ignoring Nuances: The numerical nature of Metascore overlooks the nuanced aspects of game evaluation. Games can be artistically ground breaking, innovative, or experimental, but the score might not always reflect these unique qualities.

Meta score: Final Thoughts

Metascore has become an indispensable tool for the gaming community, offering a concise and standardized measure of a game’s critical reception. Through meticulous aggregation and weighting of reviews, it provides valuable insights to gamers, developers, and industry professionals. However, it is essential to recognize its limitations and use it as one of many tools when evaluating video games. As gaming continues to evolve, Meta score will likely adapt and refine, remaining an influential force in the dynamic and ever-growing world of video games.

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.