VgamerZ OpinionZ

Is The Witcher 3 Overhyped?

Witcher

The Witcher is a fantastic series of games, based off of what I can only assume is a fantastic set of books. With Wild Hunt on the horizon, people far and wide are getting massively excited, and tickets for the metaphorical train made of hype have all but sold out. As gamers, we know better than to fall into this trap. People start slapping impossible expectations onto projects, and on release everyone gets burned. But is The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt really going to be the second coming? Does it deserve the hype it is getting?

Frankly, I am not so sure. I played The Witcher way back in 2007, and that game was a mess. Words cannot describe the issues that plagued that game, yet its popularity warranted a full overhaul and a sequel. Performance issues and bugs aside, The Witcher was a flawed game. Combat was terrible, the world was rather restricted and it didn’t control particularly well, and it was you standard run of the mill plot and fantasy tropes mixed together with some M rated grit to make it edgy.

Enter The Witcher 2. It too had a number of launch issues, got an overhaul and an eventual console release. What is surprising however is how little really changed in the sequel. Yes the game looks prettier, yes they changed the combat and made everything look fresh, but the exact same flaws that plagued the original continue here. The combat is easy at best, and mind numbing at worst, the plot was as cut and dry as you could get, the world was still restrictive and generic, and the game still felt awfully clunky.

Now we have The Witcher 3, and lets be honest here guys, I am not expecting much in terms of a change. But why should I? Despite everything I have said, I absolutely love The Witcher, but I feel people are forgetting what makes The Witcher actually good, they are focusing too much on the graphics, the combat etc. What makes The Witcher good, is its characters and its lore. Yes the plot is meh, but the STUFF behind it all is great. Yes the world is generic, but the characters are all fantastic, gritty and real. You feel  connected with the world because you have a connection with the people in said world. Geralt of Rivia might be one of the dullest concepts for a character of all time, but his life, and the people he encounters make him, and his games, worth experiencing.

Wild Hunt hits store shelves mid May, and I am certainly excited for it, but the level of hype it is generating is not healthy for anyone, especially the game itself. Do yourself a favor, take a step back, and remember why these games are good.

Comments

comments

Previous ArticleNext Article

9 Comments

  1. “Geralt of Rivia might be one of the dullest concepts for a character of all time, but his life, and the people he encounters make him, and his games, worth experiencing.”
    Man, what you are saying is just ridiculous. Read that sentence once again and think about it 🙂 Also, the plot is meh? Show me ANY game with better plot. I dare you. I double dare you.

  2. “Geralt of Rivia might be one of the dullest concepts for a character of all time.”

    Laughed my ass off.

  3. I never played W1. I quit after 10 hours into W2. As soon as I started to level grind, I was bored. I will avoid W3 for a long time after the overhyped reviews come out (aka Dragon Age Inquisition, another awful game.)

    FYI. If you’re looking for a real RPG. Try Dragon’s Dogma (Dark Arisen version).

    1. This just means that story-driven RPGs are not for you, it doesn’t make them less “real RPGs”. I’d even argue that Dragon’s Dogma isn’t a real RPG.
      On one point I agree with you” Dragon Age: Inquisition wasn’t very good, mostly because of a not very strong story and lots of filler. Which isn’t going to be the case in The Witcher 3, based on the devs track record and on the preview impressions by the journalists.

  4. I cannot respect the opinion of a person that didn’t like Witched 1, the most innovative and accomplished RPG of our decade. Witcher 2 and, I expect Witcher 3, aren’t half as good as their predecessor. W1 is a classic of the importance of Baldour’s Gate. What a stupid writer….

    1. I didn’t say I didn’t like The Witcher. I merely stated that the game is flawed, and what those flaws were. The article itself is not ANTI WITCHER, it is merely something to remind people of what the Witcher is actually about (or at least what I think the Witcher is about), which ultimately is the characters.

      Speaking of Baldur’s Gate though, I own it several times now. Still have my 1000000 CD original copy XD

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Send this to a friend